<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Fresh.Thoughts - Latest Comments in Unit testing private methods.. not again!</title><link>http://dotfresh.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://dotfresh.disqus.com/unit_testing_private_methods_not_again/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:21:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Unit testing private methods.. not again!</title><link>http://dotfresh.blogspot.com/2008/11/unit-testing-private-methods-not-again.html#comment-12633515</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is about the same as using reflection. See above.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Artëm Smirnov</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:21:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unit testing private methods.. not again!</title><link>http://dotfresh.blogspot.com/2008/11/unit-testing-private-methods-not-again.html#comment-9569371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's also InternalVisibleTo attribute at our disposal :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 03:42:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>